Forget about religion for a
moment. What would the great evolutionary biologist Charles Darwin think
about gay marriage ? Darwin - himself from a respectable pious
background-would still see human society as having evolved from monkey
society. In Nature " survival " means survival of the SPECIES. Nature
would simply veto gay mating. A gay human society would not survive a
single generation.
But Marx might see gay marriage as not incompatible with human civilization. And a social scientist- aware of the human population explosion-might see gay marriage -even an increase in homosexuality- as a salubrious check on overpopulation.
The Catholic Church now accepts human evolution -but insists that the faith is beyond science.
I think science and religion should get along.I am not impressed with mediocre scientists who bash religious faith. I am definitely not impressed with the New Atheism. It could learn manners and respect from Catholic Bishop Tobin . And social philosophy from Pope Francis.
I commend Bishop Tobin for his fighting Irish guts.
But Marx might see gay marriage as not incompatible with human civilization. And a social scientist- aware of the human population explosion-might see gay marriage -even an increase in homosexuality- as a salubrious check on overpopulation.
The Catholic Church now accepts human evolution -but insists that the faith is beyond science.
I think science and religion should get along.I am not impressed with mediocre scientists who bash religious faith. I am definitely not impressed with the New Atheism. It could learn manners and respect from Catholic Bishop Tobin . And social philosophy from Pope Francis.
I commend Bishop Tobin for his fighting Irish guts.
Bishop Tobin says Mass |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that are courteous, concise and relevant are always welcome, whether or not they agree with the views expressed here or not. Profanity is not necessary. Thank you for reading “Time Enough At Last!”
Ron