I must have been living under a rock ! I did not even suspect that
the term " mental patient " is " both archaic and offensive " until
letter writer Steven A. Brinker - with his " extensive experience in
the mental health profession " - pointed this out to me. ( " Don't
call them 'mental patients', " Providence Journal, July 8 )
Perhaps in the enlightened future there will be no more " drug addicts "
or even " coronary patients ". Beware of offensive stereotypes!
So now " mental patient " is the moral equivalent of the N-word ?
Have we made REAL progress in our treatment of the " psychiatrically
challenged " ? Perhaps these are the people who actually get to be
treated by psychiatrists. But what about those - let me use an even cruder
term - CRAZY PEOPLE we see all over the place in a city like Providence ?
Have our enlightened social workers - so sensitive with WORDS - discovered
that they don't really exists as potential " psychiatric patients " ? Only
people who think in terms of stereotypes - such as yours truly - actually
see a scandalous crime of NEGLECT here .
Writes Steven Brinker : " There are no MENTAL HOSPITALS for MENTAL
PATIENTS ". And that my smug " social worker " is just the problem !
The language police think that by changing WORDS we can change
REALITY . HUMBUG !
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that are courteous, concise and relevant are always welcome, whether or not they agree with the views expressed here or not. Profanity is not necessary. Thank you for reading “Time Enough At Last!”
Ron