Is There A WAR On Science? Lawrence Krauss [ SCIENCE as a human institution has been corrupted by CAPITALISM, AMERICAN IMPERIALISM, and ISRAELI ZIONISM ]

There is no real WAR ON SCIENCE . But SCIENCE as a human institution has been corrupted by CAPITALISM, AMERICAN IMPERIALISM , and ISRAELI ZIONISM. The vast majority of working, employed, professional scientists are employed in the service of the world wide military industrial complex , global Corporate Capitalism , and Israeli Zionism. Professional scientists attached to the surreal world of Academia are invariably mouth pieces for the WOKE WARRIOR Democratic Party ( Darwin would blush at this , but you cannot get a Harvard biologist today to state that MEN are MEN and WOMEN are WOMEN , and in all of Nature sexual selection ( male and female ) is highly significant ). The under-employed , second rate scientists joining the cause of the New Atheism Cult evangelism on YouTube never apply their deified LOGIC and REASON to the burning issues of the day. They seem to think that endlessly bashing God & FAITH will overnight make the world a more rational place as if they were the reincarnated spirits of the Age Of Enlightenment . HUMAN SOCIETY has never been changed by Appeal to Reason. The Greek philosopher Plato , who wrote " The Republic " could not understand WHY 2600 years ago. Plato did astutely perceive that reform of human society was connected to ending PRIVATE PROPERTY squabbles . As we democratic socialists do in this 21st century . NOTE : PLATO on PRIVATE PROPERTY AI Overview [In Plato's ideal state, as depicted in The Republic, the ruling class, known as the guardians, were not permitted to own private property. This prohibition extended to houses, land, and personal possessions, as Plato believed that material wealth could corrupt their judgment and detract from their focus on the common good. The guardians were to live communally, sharing everything in common, including wives and children, to foster unity and prevent conflicts arising from personal interests. Here's a more detailed breakdown: Guardians as Servants: . Plato viewed the guardians as servants of the state, dedicated to the well-being of all citizens. Common Ownership: . For the guardians, Plato advocated for common ownership, where they would share everything, including resources and even family life, according to The New York Times. Avoiding Corruption: . The prohibition of private property was intended to prevent the guardians from being tempted by wealth and power, ensuring they remained focused on justice and the common good. Incentive for Virtue: . By removing the distractions of personal wealth, Plato believed the guardians would be more likely to act virtuously and make decisions based on reason rather than self-interest. Lower Classes: . While the guardians were to live communally, Plato did not extend this prohibition to the other classes in his ideal state, suggesting that farmers, artisans, and other citizens could own property. In essence, Plato's attitude toward private property was one of cautious acceptance for the majority but outright prohibition for the ruling class, believing it was a necessary measure to ensure the virtue and stability of his ideal society, says The Imaginative Conservative. Property and Freedom - The New York Times The ideal Platonic state consisted of two castes: the rulers, called "Guardians," made up of the oldest and wisest members of the ... The New York Times Citizens, Agriculture and Property in Plato's Republic and ... Apr 19, 2011 — Abstract. In the ideal city of the Republic, Plato forbids property ownership for the guardians while he retains priva... SSRN eLibrary What Are Plato's 5 Forms of Government? | HISTORY Sep 5, 2024 — Promising candidates would be educated and trained in the superiority of reason and the bridling of passions. The best ... History.com] Show all