Fwd: Why are newspaper editors no longer ( with printed editions in free fall ! ) very polite to habitual " writers of letters " ?

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Ron Ruggieri <radicalron72647@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 at 10:32
Subject: Why are newspaper editors no longer ( with printed editions in free fall ! ) very polite to habitual " writers of letters " ?
To: <letter@globe.com>, Letters, NYT <letters@nytimes.com>, <letters@nypost.com>, letters <letters@providencejournal.com>, Letters <letters@latimes.com>, <letters@browndailyherald.com>, <uricigar@gmail.com>, <letters@bfp.burlingtonfreepress.com>, <letters@timesrepublican.com>, <ReportIt@wpri.com>

The New York Times rarely acknowledges my letters. The Las Angeles Times always. The Providence Journal never. The Boston Globe sometimes. Years ago editors were much more courteous to letter writers

[Automated Reply Re: Screenshot (Mar 1, 2025 3:19:51 AM) Inbox Letters, NYT 06:23 (3 hours ago) to me Thank you for your letter to The New York Times. If your letter is selected for publication — in all editions (print and online) or only online, and possibly in The International New York Times as well — we will contact you within a week. We regret that because of the large number of submissions we are not able to respond to all of them, other than by this automated reply. (You will receive an auto-reply only once every four days.) Check the list below so you can re-route a message to another department if appropriate. Letters should ideally be 150 to 200 words and may be shortened to fit allotted space. They must be exclusive to The Times (no prior publication in other news outlets, except for nytimes.com). They should generally refer to an article that has appeared within the last seven days. ]

  Ron Ruggieri , 75 Mathewson St., Cranston,Rhode Island ( 401-580-7432 )