I read the AP story TWICE just because it was so MONSTROUS. Would
a man-even a real CREEP- inject his own son with HIV tainted blood in
order to avoid rather modest child support payments ?
The horror of AIDS death is that it is long suffering agony. A child
with AIDS would also be quite EXPENSIVE to support.
A brainless maniac and a pitiless psychopath might do just what Brian T.
Stewart is accused of doing. But reading the story ( April 24 ) it is
clear that the evidence against him already reported is hardly overwhelming.
He may indeed be INNOCENT . To be sure he needs a good lawyer.
I read : " after eliminating all possible ways the kid could obtain
the HIV virus...."
Not so fast ! How can police investigators be sure about ALL POSSIBLE
WAYS? HIV is a very TRICKY molecular assassin !
Can HIV tainted blood be STOLEN from a hospital without a number of
possible eye witnesses? What a lax security !
Mr. Stewart, a lab aide, being seen with a white lab coat in his son's
room - is pretty flimsy EVIDENCE of a monstrous crime .
If Stewart insists he is innocent, he deserves as good a legal defense
as O.J Simpson.
Things are not always what they seem. A good anti-dote to lynch mob
fervor.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that are courteous, concise and relevant are always welcome, whether or not they agree with the views expressed here or not. Profanity is not necessary. Thank you for reading “Time Enough At Last!”
Ron