Good morning Dave . I just read your column . I would give
it A+ for rhetorical respectability- and considering other columns on
this divisive issue - give A for class.
I can accept " high misdemeanor " now that the Senate trial is
a reality the nation must live with.
But I would VOTE -if I could - with your favorite Rhode Island
politician, The Honorable Patrick Kennedy . ( if he could too )
What could ruin President Clinton instantly would be Hillary
herself publicly humiliating him : " You're a liar and a cheat and
I want the House ! "
Then it would become clear that the issue is now BEYOND the
laws of the land. The President is ALSO the chief public relations
officer of American society. He would be immediately crippled in THIS
function if Hillary turned on him .
That is the ONE circumstance in which a Clinton resignation -
whatever his legal position - would be advised by his most loyal
supporters.
I hope the country will get over this crap !
Have a nice day - ron
- - - - - - - - - - - -
comment from Dave Brussat
Ron - Thanks for your note. If I were the Democratic Party, I would be
bullshit at Clinton, who has veered to the right, beyond center, and then
plunged the party into humiliation. I hope you'll enjoy our editorial about
Patrick in tomorrow's paper (unless it's pulled!).
- Dave
Inspired from youth by Albert Camus' sense of the Absurd, I try to be a voice for REASON in the growing darkness and moral insanity of global capitalism .
Thursday, January 7, 1999
Wednesday, January 6, 1999
Can DNA locate pharaoh's own ?
There are plenty of fairly well preserved Egyptian mummies, already
objects of medical research . Many of these mummies were the most
exalted rulers of their day , a few vainglorious conquerors .And many
of them reproduced royally; one pharaoh, I read, fathered nearly 100
children.
I wonder if modern " miracle " DNA testing of the present Egyptian
population - especially the people whose features recall the ancient
Egyptian as pictured on those colossal buildings near the Valley of
the Dead - can establish definite kinship with old dynasties.
I don't know what good would come from such an ambitious
genealogical project : Could some obscure Egyptian citizen claim
King Tut's wealth ? Perhaps there would be a new version of " The Mummy's
Curse " !
Now if some of those mummies can be cloned ?
objects of medical research . Many of these mummies were the most
exalted rulers of their day , a few vainglorious conquerors .And many
of them reproduced royally; one pharaoh, I read, fathered nearly 100
children.
I wonder if modern " miracle " DNA testing of the present Egyptian
population - especially the people whose features recall the ancient
Egyptian as pictured on those colossal buildings near the Valley of
the Dead - can establish definite kinship with old dynasties.
I don't know what good would come from such an ambitious
genealogical project : Could some obscure Egyptian citizen claim
King Tut's wealth ? Perhaps there would be a new version of " The Mummy's
Curse " !
Now if some of those mummies can be cloned ?
Dr. Freud asked it too ! (to Gail Ciampa @ ProJo.com)
Dear Gail, your exuberant column today reminded me of a conclusion
I arrived at decades ago: There is no passion in the world that can
rival MOTHERHOOD .
Dr. Freud asked this rather sexist question : " But just WHAT does
a woman want? "
What she wants Doctor is a BABY, preferably " the most perfect girl
in the whole wide world ".
And a few other things to make the joy complete !
Have a nice day ron
I arrived at decades ago: There is no passion in the world that can
rival MOTHERHOOD .
Dr. Freud asked this rather sexist question : " But just WHAT does
a woman want? "
What she wants Doctor is a BABY, preferably " the most perfect girl
in the whole wide world ".
And a few other things to make the joy complete !
Have a nice day ron
Tuesday, January 5, 1999
Jeff Jacoby's drool
Boston Globe columnist, Jeff Jacoby, must fancy himself
- madly - as a patient conservative educator desperately trying to
wisen up misguided and oh so HATEFUL liberals. He thinks it has been
a banner year for Liberal Hate.
I am more than willing to learn useful things from conservatives
and they have the perfectly human right to try to modify or change
my opinions. After all, I never stop READING them !
But on the Clinton impeachment controversy I have read very few
intellectually respectable articles or columns written by self -described
conservatives. They invariably indulge in repetitious drivel, the same
phrases over and over again - repeated with as much subtlety as a sledge
hammer on a stone wall: " obstruction of justice ... lying under
oath... no honor or integrity . "
This style of arguing is more worth of the Nazis under Hitler.
For Jacoby to talk about Liberal Hate is lot like Hitler talking
about Jewish insolence . ( more worthy )
- madly - as a patient conservative educator desperately trying to
wisen up misguided and oh so HATEFUL liberals. He thinks it has been
a banner year for Liberal Hate.
I am more than willing to learn useful things from conservatives
and they have the perfectly human right to try to modify or change
my opinions. After all, I never stop READING them !
But on the Clinton impeachment controversy I have read very few
intellectually respectable articles or columns written by self -described
conservatives. They invariably indulge in repetitious drivel, the same
phrases over and over again - repeated with as much subtlety as a sledge
hammer on a stone wall: " obstruction of justice ... lying under
oath... no honor or integrity . "
This style of arguing is more worth of the Nazis under Hitler.
For Jacoby to talk about Liberal Hate is lot like Hitler talking
about Jewish insolence . ( more worthy )
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)