---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Ron Ruggieri <radicalron72647@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 at 13:28
Subject: Why is this longtime independent democratic socialist BANNED IN COMMUNIST CHINA and BANNED ON THE WORLD SOCIALIST WEB SITE ?
To: Letters, NYT <letters@nytimes.com>
From: Ron Ruggieri <radicalron72647@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 at 13:28
Subject: Why is this longtime independent democratic socialist BANNED IN COMMUNIST CHINA and BANNED ON THE WORLD SOCIALIST WEB SITE ?
To: Letters, NYT <letters@nytimes.com>
Will Socialist Equality Party " Trotskyist " leader ( and millionaire owner-well documented- of a printing company ) David North please explain how a longtime independent, democratic socialist's blog views can be BANNNED IN COMMUNIST CHINA and BANNED ON THE WORLD SOCIALIST WEB SITE and also frequently blocked by the ZIONIST Jew censorship of American public opinion ? Where in my now 27, 000 blog posts with Two MILLION plus 300, 000 views do I say anything blatantly " violating community guidelines " or violating democratic socialist values or obviously anti-Semitic ? Just this morning I thought I had an opening for comment on the World Socialist Web Site . I posted a comment that asked a question : " How is Chinese Stalinism any different from old Russian Stalinism ? A red striped notice quickly appears : " We are unable to post your comment because you have been banned by from the World Socialist Website ". What was North's complaint to the New York Times when he perceived that social media was blocking views of the World Socialist Web Site ?
If there is a more obtuse, sectarian Marxist " vanguard party " than David North's SEP , somebody let me know . How does turning off millions of working class Christians promote serious social change ? And faceless AI generated " Trotskyist " articles on world events are not " Ten Days That Shook The World " people arousing !
Ron Ruggieri , 75 Mathewson St., Cranston , Rhode Island ( 401-829-5949 )
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that are courteous, concise and relevant are always welcome, whether or not they agree with the views expressed here or not. Profanity is not necessary. Thank you for reading “Time Enough At Last!”
Ron