Wednesday, June 25, 2014

There is a science of wealth creation ( Economy news)

  The ECONOMY news in the Providence Journal today ( A10 , June 25 ) reports: " Wealth gap widens amid slow recovery, researchers report ". Why is wealth and wealth creation so mystified by the capitalist news media ?  Why does it make finance capital , the creation of profit- of social surplus value- seem the magical power of wealthy individuals ?  The gods of the  " free market " are not to be questioned in the same way  Isaac Newton questioned the forces of nature ?
        Only in the last two centuries were the mysteries of mass-energy solved. The fundamental law of conservation of energy- oddly enough, discovered during the Industrial Revolution- prohibits the creation of something from nothing. You think this fundamental scientific discovery has no relevance to human wealth creation, to capitalist economics ?  You think our tiny plutocracy makes more EFFORT than the rest of humanity combined ?  But  all EFFORT -even intellectual EFFORT - has only one objective measure known to  biological science : calorie consumption. The brain of our very busy plutocrat  operates at the energy rate of a dull light bulb. Otherwise his active brain would simply have a feverish meltdown.
              This is not a compelling argument for radical egalitarianism. But it does set limits on how much wealth can be rationally permitted to any single individual. A socialist society will not deprive any individual of the fruits of his or her labor. It will simply socialize tangible surplus wealth. And why should a majority of voters not decide in favor of real economic justice ?  Is real democracy so very subversive to our American plutocracy ?
        Can we afford to ignore simple science ?  If any economics scholar at the Providence Journal can make a fool of me here, let him do so . Or let HER : consult your LETTERS favorite, Susan Berge, the oracle of Burrillville  I  very much want to know if I am a fool before I sleep the sleep of the just !

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments that are courteous, concise and relevant are always welcome, whether or not they agree with the views expressed here or not. Profanity is not necessary. Thank you for reading “Time Enough At Last!”

Ron