Dave, I always appreciated your " war " on modernism in
architecture. It's just a gut feeling for beauty, elegance, and
grandeur. I cannot always follow your specialized knowledge. For me it
oddly resonates with the war on " modernism " within the Catholic
Church. Here it assumes many forms. Not just the end of certain
beautiful rituals-like the Latin Mass( forget about theology here-it's
just aesthetics ) . Only a dead soul will not appreciate the splendor
of the old European cathedrals. And yet in the era of Vatican II even
the architecture of newly constructed Catholic churches was hideously
corrupted. When I attended my brother Ray's funeral mass at St.
Stephen's on Warwick Ave. in Warwick, I was more than distracted by the
profane design of the building- like a college gymnasium or a circus
tent. Does it not reflect the spiritual deadness of the architect ?
Does not all this hideous architectural " modernism " that
you protest against so often reflect a whole civilization in an
advanced state of decay ? Is there anything reactionary about pure
beauty ? Keep up the good fight here ! ( even if politics is
hopeless )
Ron, I refer to such profane ecclesiastical edifi collectively as the
Church of St. George Jetson. Without wanting to politicize my
discourse, I've written quite a bit about how valid it is to compare
modernism with moral erosion, corporate excess, totalitarian rule, etc.,
etc. There is a lot of that on my blog (now independent of the
Journal). For example, a piece called "Is beauty conservative?" and
another more recently called "An ecclesiastical mood." If you would
like, I will add you to my send list, if you are not already on it.
Dave
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments that are courteous, concise and relevant are always welcome, whether or not they agree with the views expressed here or not. Profanity is not necessary. Thank you for reading “Time Enough At Last!”
Ron