Why not take the next logical step and protest the institution of bourgeois marriage -based on capitalist PRIVATE PROPERTY - often murderously quarreled over in the divorce courts ?
In a democratic socialist society women will not get rich by an upwardly mobile marriage . But also men will not be enslaved by a socially isolated family - condemned to a wretched individual struggle for existence.
In a socialist society men and women can have " marriage " as monogamous as they can stand, but THE LAW will be out of it. A women can have one lover or one hundred lovers . Who cares ? Economic " seduction " will be all but impossible. There will be no puritanical condemnation of natural sexuality - which has its own natural rhythms.
How do you explain an Orwellian " Anti-Sex League " hysteria in the USA along with the most vulgar -and SMART PHONE AVAILABLE - pornography ( in which the prurient can witness MALE & FEMALE shockingly and blissfully uninhibited ?
Comments that are courteous, concise and relevant are always welcome, whether or not they agree with the views expressed here or not. Profanity is not necessary. Thank you for reading “Time Enough At Last!”