Brian T. Stewart -rat suspect but guilty ?

 I read the AP story TWICE just because it was so MONSTROUS. Would

    a man-even a real CREEP- inject his own son with HIV tainted blood in

    order to avoid rather modest child support payments ?

       The horror of AIDS death is that it is long suffering agony. A child

    with AIDS would also be quite EXPENSIVE to support.

       A brainless maniac and a pitiless psychopath might do just what Brian T.

    Stewart is accused of doing. But reading the story ( April 24 ) it is

    clear that the evidence against him already reported is hardly overwhelming.

    He may indeed be INNOCENT . To be sure he needs a good lawyer.

       I read : " after eliminating all possible ways the kid could obtain

    the HIV virus...."

        Not so fast ! How can police investigators be sure about ALL POSSIBLE

    WAYS? HIV is a very TRICKY molecular assassin !

        Can HIV tainted blood be STOLEN from a hospital without a number of

    possible eye witnesses? What a lax security !

       Mr. Stewart, a lab aide, being seen with a white lab coat in his son's

    room - is pretty flimsy EVIDENCE of a monstrous crime .

       If Stewart insists he is innocent, he deserves as good a legal defense

    as O.J Simpson.

       Things are not always what they seem. A good anti-dote to lynch mob

    fervor.